Alfie Meek's Weekly Economic Digest and Commentary

Alfie Meek's Weekly Economic Digest and Commentary

Weekly Economic Update 04-03-26: Case-Shiller Home Price Index; ISM Manufacturing Index; Consumer Confidence; JOLTS Report; and the March Employment Report

Fed Chair Jerome Powell's term can't end quickly enough.

Alfie Meek, Ph.D.
Apr 03, 2026
∙ Paid
The views and opinions expressed in this post are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Georgia Institute of Technology or the Georgia Board of Regents. 

It has been a while since I offered an edition of “stupid economic statement of the week.” Long-time readers will know that honor usually, but not always, goes to that icon of economic buffoonery, Paul Krugman. (I realize that Mr. Krugman has a Nobel Prize in economics, but that says more about the Nobel Prize committee than it does Mr. Krugman.) In any event, this week’s honor falls to Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose mediocre term as Fed Chair is thankfully coming to an ignominious end.

Earlier this week, Chair Powell spoke to a principles of economics class at Harvard. I find that somewhat ironic because it is highly unlikely that he himself ever took a principles of economics class. In fact, all available evidence suggests he did not, and if he did, he slept through it. Remember that Powell is the first Fed Chair in 40 years without a Ph.D. in economics. Instead, he has an A.B. degree in Politics and a law degree, both of which were awarded in the 1970s. Rather than any formal economic training, he has relied on his extensive experience as a lawyer and investment banker to steer the U.S. economy. Is it any wonder that we find ourselves where we are today? Not that having a Ph.D. in economics is all that special (I speak from experience), but having some economic background should be a requirement for Fed Chair.

But I digress. In his talk this week, Powell claimed that “Quantitative Easing” (or “QE”, which was an explosion of the money supply) did not cause inflation. Specifically, he said, referring to QE, “at the very beginning, there was a thought that it would be inflationary. We have not seen that.” DO WHAT?

Looking at the graph below, you decide if the expansion of the money supply in 2021, 2022, and 2023 was correlated with inflation.

And before you ask why inflation didn’t fall more after the brief period of monetary contraction, remember that prices are sticky downward.

He went on to list other negative consequences of QE, including treasury market inefficiency, income inequality, etc., and then said about them all, “We haven’t really seen the downside risks.” Uh, actually, Mr. Powell, we have seen ALL of these downside risks.

I have absolutely no idea in which universe Powell resides, but it certainly isn’t this one. How totally out of touch do you have to be to make such a stupid comment?

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Alfie Meek's Weekly Economic Digest and Commentary to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Alfie Meek, Ph.D. · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture